Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Toby Samuel vs Phoenix Weir Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Samuel vs Weir analysis and find out who is favored!
Toby Samuel vs Phoenix Weir Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Samuel 1 - 0 Weir
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Samuel has won 32.26% of points on their second serve, while Weir has won 52.8%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Samuel, in recent form, has won 64.29% of their opponent's second serve points, while Weir has won 52.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.04% and 32.75% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Samuel has saved 64.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Weir has saved 62.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Samuel has won 65.71% of matches played (W/L 23/ 12), with Weir winning 51.22% (W/L 21/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Samuel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 75% (W/L 18/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 13/ 8). Weir has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 16/ 10), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Samuel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 18/ 6), where as Weir has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.22% of matches (W/L 21/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Samuel winning 1 times and Weir being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Samuel winning 2 and Weir winning 0. The last match between Samuel and Weir was at the M25 Edgbaston, 17-10-2023, First, I.hard with Toby Samuel getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:54:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Samuel and Weir have played a deciding set 0 times, with Samuel winning 0 times and Weir 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Samuel winning 0, and Weir 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Samuel has played against opponents with an average rank of 270.14 while Weir has played against players with an average rank of 55.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Samuel has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Weir has won 27% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Samuel has converted 55.56% of breakpoint opportunities, and Weir has converted 42.57% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
477
Rank
404
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
69% (45-20)
Career Total W/L
48% (26-28)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
47% (8-9)
$36,000
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Toby Samuel vs Phoenix Weir For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Samuel VS Weir
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Toby Samuel | Phoenix Weir |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:54:0 | 0:54:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 80% (32/40) | 59% (30/51) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (26/32) | 60% (18/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 75% (6/8) | 33% (7/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (26/51) | 20% (8/40) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Toby Samuel
Player
Phoenix Weir
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Toby Samuel | Phoenix Weir |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 47% (8/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 49% (20/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (13/14) | 52% (229/214) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 54% (7/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 1 | 76 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 31 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:23:7 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 41.94 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (70/101) | 60% (639/1067) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (44/70) | 70% (449/639) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 32% (10/31) | 53% (226/428) |
| BPs Won% Total | 56% (5/9) | 43% (43/101) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (38/82) | 39% (408/1037) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 47% (8/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 47% (8/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 13% (8/1) |
Toby Samuel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Fausto Tabacco
Player
Toby Samuel
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
101)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
91
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Sousa
Player
Toby Samuel
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
59
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andres Martin
Player
Toby Samuel
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Samuel
Player
Ryan Seggerman
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
5
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
3
87%
(
52 of
60)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
44 of
56)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
25 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
21 of
81)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(6) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Blockx
Player
Toby Samuel
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Samuel
Player
Finn Bass
57%
(
55 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
67 of
97)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
44 of
67)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Samuel
Player
Oscar Weightman
67%
(
66 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
36 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Toby Samuel
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Toby Samuel
Player
Paul Jubb
69%
(
77 of
111)
1st Serve %
71%
(
75 of
105)
12
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
58 of
77)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
55 of
75)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
35 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
112
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 6-7(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Samuel
Player
Tiran Sanghera
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
9
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
9 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Phoenix Weir Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Shaw
Player
Phoenix Weir
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
Matthew Hulme
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Delicata
Player
Phoenix Weir
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 7-5 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stijn Pel
Player
Phoenix Weir
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Phoenix Weir
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
Nicolas Colne
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-7(6) 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
Cezar Mihai Lupean
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
9%
(
3 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
51
Total Points Won
12
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
Player
Phoenix Weir
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
Ryan James Storrie
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Samuel Vs Weir Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Samuel are available here and Weir photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
